Growth Mindset Interventions and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Implications for Educational Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71238/snhss.v2i02.203Abstract
Growth mindset interventions are widely adopted in schools on the premise that teaching students that intellectual abilities can be developed will raise academic achievement, yet published syntheses disagree about how large, and how dependable, the effect is. This study conducted a systematic review and second-order meta-analysis of the strongest available evidence in order to clarify what the pooled effects imply for educational management. Following a PRISMA 2020-adapted protocol, we identified three large meta-analytic syntheses and four large randomized field experiments conducted in the United States, England, and Norway. Effect estimates were extracted, standard errors were reconstructed from confidence intervals, and estimates were compared through contrast tests, heterogeneity statistics, prediction-interval-based probabilities, and practical-significance translations. Pooled effects on academic achievement ranged from d = 0.02 (highest-quality studies) through d = 0.05 (all studies) to d = 0.14 (targeted subsamples with high implementation fidelity). The difference between the quality-restricted and the targeted estimate was statistically detectable (z = 2.08, p = .038), and between-estimate heterogeneity was high (I2 = 76.9%). Under a prediction interval of -0.08 to 0.35, an approximately 89% chance of a positive effect in a new, comparable implementation is implied, but only about 63% of an effect of at least 0.10. We conclude that growth mindset interventions are best treated as a low-cost, context-dependent supplement rather than a system-wide strategy. Managers should target at-risk students, secure fidelity, align school structures with the message, and evaluate locally.
Downloads
References
C. S. Dweck and E. L. Leggett, “A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality,” Psychological Review, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 256–273, 1988, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256.
C. S. Dweck, Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House, 2006.
D. S. Yeager and C. S. Dweck, “Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 302–314, 2012, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.722805.
L. S. Blackwell, K. H. Trzesniewski, and C. S. Dweck, “Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention,” Child Development, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 246–263, 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x.
D. Paunesku, G. M. Walton, C. Romero, E. N. Smith, D. S. Yeager, and C. S. Dweck, “Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement,” Psychological Science, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 784–793, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0956797615571017.
D. S. Yeager et al., “Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 374–391, 2016, doi: 10.1037/edu0000098.
K. Leithwood, A. Harris, and D. Hopkins, “Seven strong claims about successful school leadership,” School Leadership & Management, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 27–42, 2008, doi: 10.1080/13632430701800060.
V. M. J. Robinson, C. A. Lloyd, and K. J. Rowe, “The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types,” Educational Administration Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 635–674, 2008, doi: 10.1177/0013161X08321509.
V. F. Sisk, A. P. Burgoyne, J. Sun, J. L. Butler, and B. N. Macnamara, “To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses,” Psychological Science, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 549–571, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0956797617739704.
B. N. Macnamara and A. P. Burgoyne, “Do growth mindset interventions impact students' academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 149, no. 3-4, pp. 133–173, 2023, doi: 10.1037/bul0000352.
J. L. Burnette et al., “A systematic review and meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions: For whom, how, and why might such interventions work?,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 149, no. 3-4, pp. 174–205, 2023, doi: 10.1037/bul0000368.
C. J. Bryan, E. Tipton, and D. S. Yeager, “Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution,” Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 980–989, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01143-3.
E. Tipton, C. Bryan, J. Murray, M. A. McDaniel, B. Schneider, and D. S. Yeager, “Why meta-analyses of growth mindset and other interventions should follow best practices for examining heterogeneity: Commentary on Macnamara and Burgoyne (2023) and Burnette et al. (2023),” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 149, no. 3-4, pp. 229–241, 2023, doi: 10.1037/bul0000384.
D. S. Yeager et al., “A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement,” Nature, vol. 573, no. 7774, pp. 364–369, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y.
M. Rege et al., “How can we inspire nations of learners? An investigation of growth mindset and challenge-seeking in two countries,” American Psychologist, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 755–767, 2021, doi: 10.1037/amp0000647.
F. Foliano, H. Rolfe, J. Buzzeo, J. Runge, and D. Wilkinson, Changing mindsets: Effectiveness trial. London, UK: Education Endowment Foundation, 2019.
M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, Art. no. n71, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
J. P. T. Higgins and S. G. Thompson, “Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1539–1558, 2002, doi: 10.1002/sim.1186.
J. IntHout, J. P. A. Ioannidis, M. M. Rovers, and J. J. Goeman, “Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis,” BMJ Open, vol. 6, no. 7, Art. no. e010247, 2016, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010247.
M. A. Kraft, “Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions,” Educational Researcher, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 241–253, 2020, doi: 10.3102/0013189X20912798.
M. Borenstein, L. V. Hedges, J. P. T. Higgins, and H. R. Rothstein, Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2009, doi: 10.1002/9780470743386.
E. Bettinger, S. Ludvigsen, M. Rege, I. F. Solli, and D. Yeager, “Increasing perseverance in math: Evidence from a field experiment in Norway,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 146, pp. 1–15, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.11.032.
J. A. Durlak and E. P. DuPre, “Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation,” American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 41, no. 3-4, pp. 327–350, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.
C. S. Dweck, “Carol Dweck revisits the "growth mindset",” Education Week, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 20–24, 2015.
D. S. Yeager and C. S. Dweck, “What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?,” American Psychologist, vol. 75, no. 9, pp. 1269–1284, 2020, doi: 10.1037/amp0000794.
J. Hattie, Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge, 2009, doi: 10.4324/9780203887332.
Y. Li and T. C. Bates, “You can't change your basic ability, but you work at things, and that's how we get hard things done: Testing the role of growth mindset on response to setbacks, educational attainment, and cognitive ability,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 148, no. 9, pp. 1640–1655, 2019, doi: 10.1037/xge0000669.
A. S. Bryk and B. Schneider, Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 2002.
K. Haimovitz and C. S. Dweck, “The origins of children's growth and fixed mindsets: New research and a new proposal,” Child Development, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 1849–1859, 2017, doi: 10.1111/cdev.12955.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Endin Nasrudin, Dadang Sahroni, Eki Agustin (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



