Modernizing Enterprise Data Governance with AI-Powered Lineage Intelligence, End-to-End Data Traceability, and Automated Metadata Management in SAP Datasphere
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71238/snnst.v2i02.197Abstract
Trust becomes difficult to sustain when organizations cannot explain data origins, transformations, or consumption. This study explores the modernization of enterprise data governance through AI-powered lineage intelligence, end-to-end traceability, and automated metadata management in SAP Datasphere. The research problem concerns disconnected metadata, opaque data movement, labor-intensive impact assessment, and inconsistent accountability across systems. A mixed-method design combines measures of lineage coverage, metadata completeness, dependency-detection accuracy, and governance response time with qualitative evidence from data stewards, architects, analysts, and compliance specialists. Results show that intelligent lineage discovery clarifies data relationships, exposes hidden dependencies, shortens impact analysis, and improves readiness for audits and regulatory reviews. A unified governance framework is introduced to connect metadata harvesting, semantic modeling, lineage visualization, policy monitoring, stewardship workflows, and human verification. This framework advances practice by linking technical data flows with business definitions, ownership responsibilities, and governance controls. Practical implications include stronger data quality, reliable analytical assets, responsible AI adoption, and faster decision-making. Academic significance arises from positioning lineage intelligence as a component of governance maturity. The study concludes that SAP Datasphere can support transparent and accountable data ecosystems when automated intelligence operates alongside human stewardship, offering a scalable governance direction for regulated industries and data-intensive enterprises.
Downloads
References
B. van der Sloot and E. Keymolen, “Can we trust trust-based data governance models?,” Data Policy, vol. 4, Art. no. e45, 2022, doi: 10.1017/dap.2022.36.
B. M. V. Bernardo, H. São Mamede, J. M. P. Barroso, and V. M. P. D. dos Santos, “Data governance and quality management: Innovation and breakthroughs across different fields,” J. Innov. Knowl., vol. 9, no. 4, Art. no. 100598, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100598.
Q. Zhang, X. Sun, and M. Zhang, “Data matters: A strategic action framework for data governance,” Inf. Manag., vol. 59, no. 4, Art. no. 103642, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2022.103642.
D. Boukraâ, M. Bala, and S. Rizzi, “Metadata management in data lake environments: A survey,” J. Libr. Metadata, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 215–274, 2024, doi: 10.1080/19386389.2024.2359310.
S. Hikmawati, P. I. Santosa, and I. Hidayah, “Improving data quality and data governance using master data management: A review,” IJITEE Int. J. Inf. Technol. Electr. Eng., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 90–101, 2021, doi: 10.22146/ijitee.66307.
D. Petrik, A. Untermann, and H. Baars, “Functional requirements for enterprise data catalogs: A systematic literature review,” in Software Business, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 500, 2023, pp. 3–18. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-53227-6_1.
P. Parízek and L. Hermann, “Data lineage analysis for enterprise applications by Manta: The story of Java and C# scanners,” in Proceedings of the 46th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice, 2024, pp. 25–35. doi: 10.1145/3639477.3639739.
Y. Chen, Y. Zhao, and X. Li, “An open dataset of data lineage graphs for data governance research,” Vis. Informatics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.visinf.2024.01.001.
I. Blohm, F. Wortmann, and C. Legner, “Data products, data mesh, and data fabric: New paradigm(s) for data and analytics?,” Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 643–652, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12599-024-00876-5.
J. Bode, N. Kühl, and D. Kreuzberger, “Toward avoiding the data mess: Industry insights from data mesh implementations,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 95402–95416, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3417291.
K. Bližnák, M. Munk, and A. Pilková, “A systematic review of recent literature on data governance (2017–2023),” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 149875–149888, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3476373.
I. A. Machado, C. Costa, and M. Y. Santos, “Data mesh: Concepts and principles of a paradigm shift in data architectures,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 196, pp. 263–271, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.013.
R. Abraham, J. Schneider, and J. vom Brocke, “A taxonomy of data governance decision domains in data marketplaces,” Electron. Mark., vol. 33, no. 1, Art. no. 22, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12525-023-00631-w.
P. Wieder and H. Nolte, “Toward data lakes as central building blocks for data management and analysis,” Front. Big Data, vol. 5, Art. no. 945720, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.945720.
S. Nadal, P. Jovanovic, and B. Bilalli, “Operationalizing and automating data governance,” J. Big Data, vol. 9, no. 1, Art. no. 117, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40537-022-00673-5.
R. Eichler, C. Giebler, and C. Gröger, “Modeling metadata in data lakes: A generic model,” Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 136, Art. no. 101931, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2021.101931.
K. Gierend, F. Krüger, and S. Genehr, “Provenance information for biomedical data and workflows: Scoping review,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 26, Art. no. e51297, 2024, doi: 10.2196/51297.
D. Paparova, M. Aanestad, and P. Vassilakopoulou, “Data governance spaces: The case of a national digital service for personal health data,” Inf. Organ., vol. 33, no. 1, Art. no. 100451, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2023.100451.
N. Jahnke and B. Otto, “Data catalogs in the enterprise: Applications and integration,” Datenbank-Spektrum, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 89–96, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13222-023-00445-2.
M. Cherradi, F. Bouhafer, and A. El Haddadi, “Data lake governance using IBM-Watson Knowledge Catalog,” Sci. African, vol. 21, Art. no. e01854, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01854.
K. Goel, N. Martin, and A. H. M. ter Hofstede, “Demystifying data governance for process mining: Insights from a Delphi study,” Inf. Manag., vol. 61, no. 5, Art. no. 103973, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2024.103973.
F. Ridzuan and W. M. N. W. Zainon, “A review on data quality dimensions for big data,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 234, pp. 341–348, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.008.
K. A. Jang and W. J. Kim, “Development of data governance components using DEMATEL and content analysis,” J. Supercomput., vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 3695–3709, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11227-020-03405-9.
M. Bacco, A. Kocian, and S. Chessa, “What are data spaces? Systematic survey and future outlook,” Data Br., vol. 57, Art. no. 110969, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110969.
C. Ducuing and R. H. Reich, “Data governance: Digital product passports as a case study,” Compet. Regul. Netw. Ind., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3–23, 2023, doi: 10.1177/17835917231152799.
J. Shen, S. Zhou, and F. Xiao, “Research on data quality governance for federated cooperation scenarios,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 18, Art. no. 3606, 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13183606.
D. Oreščanin, T. Hlupić, and B. Vrdoljak, “Managing personal identifiable information in data lakes,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 32164–32180, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3365042.
N. Sheehan, F. Botta, and S. Leonelli, “Unrestricted versus regulated open data governance: A bibliometric comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleotide sequence databases,” Data Sci. J., vol. 23, no. 1, Art. no. 29, 2024, doi: 10.5334/dsj-2024-029.
J. J. Zygmuntowski, L. Zoboli, and P. F. Nemitz, “Embedding European values in data governance: A case for public data commons,” Internet Policy Rev., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–29, 2021, doi: 10.14763/2021.3.1572.
A. Dolhopolov, A. Castelltort, and A. Laurent, “Implementing federated governance in data mesh architecture,” Futur. Internet, vol. 16, no. 4, Art. no. 115, 2024, doi: 10.3390/fi16040115.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rajendra Asuri (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





