Hydrogen-Embrittlement-Aware Crack Evolution Modeling for Additively Manufactured Pressure-Bearing Components: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71238/snnst.v2i02.233Keywords:
316L Stainless Steel; Additive Manufacturing; Crack Evolution; Fatigue Crack Growth; Hydrogen Embrittlement; Hydrogen Trapping; Phase fFeld Fracture; Pressure-Bearing Components; Strain Gradient PlasticityAbstract
The unique microstructures, defect populations, and residual stresses created by Additively Manufactured (AM) metallic components make prediction of hydrogen-assisted cracking highly complex and require more research. This systematic review collates 22 sources from the AM process science, hydrogen embrittlement (HE) mechanisms, experimental data on AM alloys and phase field fracture theory in a coherent framework to develop crack evolution modelling of AM pressure-bearing components accounting for HE. Stress-assisted multi-trap hydrogen transport is combined with Taylor-based crack-tip hardening models, first-principles-informed fracture energy degradation models, regularised phase field fracture models and hydrogen-accelerated fatigue models and tested against reported benchmarks. The synthesis indicates that hydrogen charging at −50 °C did not significantly affect the ductility of the conventionally manufactured 316L but did cause the hot isostatically pressed AM 316L to have almost double the ductility, the elongation based embrittlement index of laser powder bed fused 316L lattices increased from approximately 4.0% to 17.6% as the thickness of the struts increased from 0.6 to 1.4 mm, and hydrogen caused the rate of fatigue crack propagation in heat-treated laser powder bed fused Inconel 718 to increase by a factor of 2.8. Damage coefficients of 0.89, 0.67, and 0.41 are used for the degradation laws of the iron, aluminium, and nickel anchor, while explicit consideration of the evolution of hydride and Ti3Al has to be made for electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V between 0.29 and 0.90 wt.% hydrogen. The major barriers are: (1) unmeasured trap energetics in printed microstructures, (2) limited gaseous-hydrogen fatigue data, and (3) lack of qualifying criteria based on simulations.
Downloads
References
G. Álvarez, Z. Harris, K. Wada, C. Rodríguez, and E. Martínez-Pañeda, “Hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel: Influence of post-processing, printing direction, temperature and pre-straining,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 78, no. 103834, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2023.103834.
A. Behvar, M. Haghshenas, and M. B. Djukic, “Hydrogen embrittlement and hydrogen-induced crack initiation in additively manufactured metals: A critical review on mechanical and cyclic loading,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 58, pp. 1214–1239, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.232.
C. Cui, R. Ma, and E. Martínez-Pañeda, “A generalised, multi-phase-field theory for dissolution-driven stress corrosion cracking and hydrogen embrittlement,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 166, no. 104951, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2022.104951.
T. DebRoy et al., “Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties,” Prog. Mater. Sci., vol. 92, pp. 112–224, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001.
Z. Fu, P. Wu, Q. Yang, Q. Kan, and G. Kang, “Hydrogen-assisted fatigue crack propagation behavior of selective laser–melted Inconel 718 alloy,” Corros. Sci. Art. no. 111745, 2023, no. 111745, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111745.
R. P. Gangloff and B. P. Somerday, Eds., Gaseous Hydrogen Embrittlement of Materials in Energy Technologies: Mechanisms, Modelling and Future Developments, vol. 2. Woodhead Publishing, 2012. doi: 10.1533/9780857095374.
R. P. Gangloff and B. P. Somerday, Eds., Gaseous Hydrogen Embrittlement of Materials in Energy Technologies: The Problem, Its Characterisation and Effects on Particular Alloy Classes, vol. 1. Woodhead Publishing, 2012. doi: 10.1533/9780857093899.
D. Herzog, V. Seyda, E. Wycisk, and C. Emmelmann, “Additive manufacturing of metals,” Acta Mater., vol. 117, pp. 371–392, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019.
W. J. Sames, F. A. List, S. Pannala, R. R. Dehoff, and S. S. Babu, “The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing,” Int. Mater. Rev., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 315–360, 2016, doi: 10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649.
A. Yadollahi and N. Shamsaei, “Additive manufacturing of fatigue resistant materials: Challenges and opportunities,” Int. J. Fatigue, vol. 98, pp. 14–31, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.001.
S. P. Lynch, “Hydrogen embrittlement phenomena and mechanisms,” Corros. Rev., vol. 30, pp. 105–123, 2012, doi: 10.1515/corrrev-2012-0502.
I. M. Robertson et al., “Hydrogen embrittlement understood,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 2323–2341, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11661-015-2836-1.
D. Sobola and R. Dallaev, “Exploring hydrogen embrittlement: Mechanisms, consequences, and advances in metal science,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 12, 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17122972.
H. Yu et al., “Hydrogen embrittlement as a conspicuous material challenge—Comprehensive review and future directions,” Chem. Rev., vol. 124, no. 10, pp. 6271–6392, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00624.
M. Khedr, A. Hamada, W. A. Elaziem, M. Jaskari, J. Kömi, and A. Järvenpää, “Effects of wall thickness variation on hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel with lattice auxetic structures,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 6, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ma16062523.
N. Pushilina et al., “Hydrogen-induced phase transformation and microstructure evolution for Ti-6Al-4V parts produced by electron beam melting,” Metals (Basel)., vol. 8, no. 5, 2018, doi: 10.3390/met8050301.
C. Miehe, M. Hofacker, and F. Welschinger, “A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: Robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 199, no. 45–48, pp. 2765–2778, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011.
C. Miehe, F. Welschinger, and M. Hofacker, “Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: Variational principles and multi-field FE implementations,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 83, no. 10, pp. 1273–1311, 2010, doi: 10.1002/nme.2861.
J.-Y. Wu, V. P. Nguyen, C. T. Nguyen, D. Sutula, S. Sinaie, and S. P. A. Bordas, “Phase-field modeling of fracture,” in Advances in Applied Mechanics, vol. 53, 2020, pp. 1–183. doi: 10.1016/bs.aams.2019.08.001.
M. Isfandbod and E. Martínez-Pañeda, “A mechanism-based multi-trap phase field model for hydrogen assisted fracture,” Int. J. Plast., vol. 144, no. 103044, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103044.
P. K. Kristensen, C. F. Niordson, and E. Martínez-Pañeda, “A phase field model for elastic-gradient-plastic solids undergoing hydrogen embrittlement,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 143, no. 104093, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2020.104093.
E. Martínez-Pañeda, A. Golahmar, and C. F. Niordson, “A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 342, pp. 742–761, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.07.021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rupesh Ramesharo Dhore (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





