AI Driven Kubernetes Certificate Rotation and Secret Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71238/snnst.v2i01.94Keywords:
AI-Driven Operations; Certificate Rotation; Cloud-Native Systems; Control Planes; DevSecOps; Enterprise Governance; Kubernetes Security; Platform Engineering; Risk-Aware Automation; Secret GovernanceAbstract
Kubernetes has become the de facto control plane for modern cloud-native systems, yet its security foundations remain brittle at scale particularly in the management of certificates and secrets. In large enterprises, certificate rotation and secret governance are still treated as operational afterthoughts, implemented through fragmented automation, static policies, or manual interventions. These approaches fail under conditions of scale, organizational complexity, and continuous change, resulting in recurring outages, security incidents, and audit gaps. This paper introduces a risk-aware, AI-driven certificate rotation and secret governance framework for Kubernetes environments, designed as a first-class systems control plane rather than a collection of scripts or tools. The proposed framework integrates continuous telemetry, predictive risk modeling, policy-aware decisioning, and human-in-the-loop governance to autonomously manage certificate lifecycles while preserving accountability and compliance. Unlike existing approaches that rely on time-based rotation or reactive alerts, the system reasons over operational context, workload criticality, trust boundaries, and historical failure patterns to determine when, how, and whether to rotate credentials safely. We present a layered architecture and closed-loop lifecycle model that can be deployed in real-world enterprise platforms, and we evaluate its impact using operational metrics such as mean time to detect (MTTD), mean time to rotate (MTTR), outage reduction, and governance drift. The results demonstrate that intelligent, policy-driven automation can significantly reduce security toil and failure risk without sacrificing human oversight. This work reframes certificate rotation from a mechanical security task into a governed, adaptive systems problem.
Downloads
References
Google SRE Book, Site Reliability Engineering: How Google Runs Production Systems. O’Reilly, 2016.
J. Kreps, N. Narkhede, and J. Rao, “Kafka: A distributed messaging system for log processing,” in Proceedings of the NetDB, 2011, vol. 11, no. 2011, pp. 1–7.
NIST, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). 2023.
CNCF, Cloud Native Security Whitepaper. 2020.
R. Chandramouli, “Microservices-based application systems,” NIST Spec. Publ., vol. 800, no. 204, pp. 204–800, 2019.
CNCF, “Cloud Native Security Whitepaper,” 2022.
N. AI, “Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0),” URL https//nvlpubs. nist. gov/nistpubs/ai/nist. ai, pp. 100–101, 2023.
M. Fowler, Patterns of Distributed Systems. Addison-Wesley, 2019.
I. S. O. ISO, “IEC 27001: 2022; Information Security, Cybersecurity and Privacy Protection—Information Security Management Systems—Requirements,” ISO Geneva, Switzerland. Available online https//www. iso. org/standard/27001 (accessed 18 March 2025), 2022.
J. Humble and D. Farley, Continuous delivery: reliable software releases through build, test, and deployment automation. Pearson Education, 2010.
A. Basiri et al., “Chaos engineering,” IEEE Softw., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 35–41, 2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Roshan Kakarla (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





